Side by side
Crypto.com vs Gemini vs OKX
Choose up to four firms. We compare what matters when things go wrong: licences, compensation, legal protections, track record, then platforms and products.
| Firm | Crypto.com | Gemini | OKX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protection Score | 62 | 66 | 59 |
| Licence status | EU/EEA licence | EU/EEA licence | EU/EEA licence |
| European licences | MFSA | MFSA FCA | MFSA |
| Other licences | |||
| Compensation via EU/UK/CH entity | MFSA: 90% of the net liability, up to €20,000 per investor | MFSA: 90% of the net liability, up to €20,000 per investor FCA: Up to £85,000 per person per firm for investments | MFSA: 90% of the net liability, up to €20,000 per investor |
| Negative balance protection (retail) | Yes, by law via EU/UK entity | Yes, by law via EU/UK entity | Yes, by law via EU/UK entity |
| Headquarters |  Malta |  United States | Malta |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 | 2017 |
| Type | Crypto platforms (MiCA) | Crypto platforms (MiCA) | Crypto platforms (MiCA) |
| Listed / bank | — | — | — |
| Platforms | Own platform | Own platform | Own platform |
| Products | Crypto | Crypto | Crypto |
| Features | MiCA-licensed crypto | MiCA-licensed crypto | MiCA-licensed crypto |
| Full profile | Full profile | Full profile |
Partner links are marked "Visit" and may earn us commission. Capital at risk.